Applying the concept of supply & demand to art is consumer propaganda that I am not falling for.
"People copy stuff they like. They don’t copy stuff they don’t like. The more a work is copied, the more valuable it becomes. Value isn’t taken away by fans, it is added by them, every time they copy."The internet is a place corroded by consumption.
"Social media" has come to the point of no longer being the platforms we are on
but the
How much of our actions are dictated by value propositions/brand identity/so-called originality?
Numbers Likes Hits Engagement "Inactivity" —
The Internet wouldn't have survived had we not made copies; had we ignored that thought at the back of our mind, "just in case."
To be "interesting" isn't inherent to a page; meaning is derived by the viewer.
Art is the Other of which, through response, we attest to the Infinite. The Other cannot be quantized, totalized, into packets that we hold ownership of.
Personal sites are alive. Living, Breathing, Immortal (copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of) on its own, in its existence.
Refuse the notion that scarcity generates value. (The more a work is copied, the more valuable it becomes.)
Don't bring the consumer disease into the evergreen personal web.
Please copy and share.